Appeals court upholds former professor Joost Herman’s dismissal

Appeals court upholds former professor Joost Herman’s dismissal

Former professor Joost Herman has lost the appeal against his dismissal by the UG. The Leeuwarden court said the university was correct in dismissing him.
5 November om 15:34 uur.
Laatst gewijzigd op 22 November 2020
om 16:22 uur.
November 5 at 15:34 PM.
Last modified on November 22, 2020
at 16:22 PM.
Avatar photo

Door Giulia Fabrizi

5 November om 15:34 uur.
Laatst gewijzigd op 22 November 2020
om 16:22 uur.
Avatar photo

By Giulia Fabrizi

November 5 at 15:34 PM.
Last modified on November 22, 2020
at 16:22 PM.
Avatar photo

Giulia Fabrizi

Van uit de hand gelopen studentenfeestjes tot bezette universiteitsgebouwen en van kamertekorten tot dreigende bezuinigingen: Giulia houdt al het nieuws in de gaten. Ze praat graag met de mensen die het aangaat, schrijft erover en begeleidt freelancers bij het maken van nieuwsartikelen. Eerder werkte ze als stadsredacteur Groningen en gemeenteverslaggever Haren voor Dagblad van het Noorden.

Jouke de Vries, president of the board of directors at the UG, announced the news during a university council meeting on Thursday morning. The Arnhem/Leeuwarden court’s verdict isn’t public yet and therefore hasn’t been published yet, but De Vries told the council he was informed of the verdict on Wednesday.

The Groningen court decided last March that the UG’s dismissal of the professor was justified. The university fired him in January of this year for subsidies fraud and falsification of documents.

Herman is alleged to have used the private foundation Stichting NOHA Groningen (SNG) to gain access to European subsidies that were intended to go to the Groningen NOHA programme. The UG says the foundation was set up without its knowledge and therefore the funds were used outside the university’s purview.

No control

In March, a judge agreed with the university’s reasoning. By running the money through SNG, Herman ensured the university had no control over the funds, making it impossible for the UG to decide how the money was being spent.

The judge said Herman’s actions were ‘reprehensible’ and made him ‘seriously culpable’, even if Herman never intended to profit off his actions or damage the UG in any way. The judge therefore decided the UG was right in dismissing the professor. This court has confirmed it once again, said De Vries.

Dutch

05 November 2020 | 22-11-2020, 16:22
Array

De spelregels voor reageren: blijf on topic, geen herhalingen, geen URLs, geen haatspraak en beledigingen. / The rules for commenting: stay on topic, don't repeat yourself, no URLs, no hate speech or insults.

guest

0 Reacties
Most Voted
Newest Oldest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments