PhD manifesto: We are compelled to take action ourselves

PhD manifesto: We are compelled to take action ourselves

A group of around twenty PhD’s demands immediate termination of the experiment with scholarship PhD’s. It creates inequality and negatively influences their work and private lives, they say in a manifesto.
3 December om 8:39 uur.
Laatst gewijzigd op 22 November 2020
om 16:18 uur.
December 3 at 8:39 AM.
Last modified on November 22, 2020
at 16:18 PM.

We, the PhD students of the University of Groningen (UG) scholarship experiment, present this shortened manifesto to address the financial inequality and insecurity induced by the experiment, which affect our research, our working prospects and our private life. Due to our student status, we are not represented by a labour union (such as the Vakbond voor de Wetenschap). Therefore, we are compelled to take action ourselves.

The official aim of the experiment as stated in the decree on the PhD training programme experiment is: ‘(…) to investigate whether, by introducing a new PhD programme as the third cycle in the Bachelor’s-Master’s system (…), the number of university PhD graduates will increase, whether opportunities for PhD students to submit and carry out their own research proposals will improve and whether the position of PhD graduates in the labour market will improve, thereby advancing the knowledge society’.

Aim of the experiment

Even though the experiment has facilitated the creation of more PhD positions than there would usually be available, the experiment fails to take into account the well-being of the PhD students. On the one hand, PhD students principally do the same work as PhD employee, regardless of the differences in the contractual positions. Therefore, the unequal and unfavourable treatment of PhD students is unjustified.

On the other hand, the experiment has disproportionately negative consequences for all important aspects of the life of a PhD student as the ’advantages’ that the Experiment should bring about do not exist in practice (such as writing one’s own research proposals, which is also a conventional practice among PhD employees); PhD students lack a significant amount of (financial) benefits and legal protection; PhD students teach for free (whereas PhD employees and student-assistants are paid for the same work); PhD students are represented by Bachelor’s and Master’s students (and not by PhD candidates or other employees) who are unable to understand and represent our interests; and PhD students were not provided with adequate information prior to signing the scholarship contract.


Hence, the experiment has adverse effects on the research climate in the UG, which by the decree can be taken as a basis for termination of the experiment. In the event the experiment ends prematurely or otherwise, the decree states that: ‘(…) the universities will give the PhD training-programme students who have not yet graduated the opportunity to complete the PhD programme as employees of the university’. We, the signatories, therefore ask for:

  1. Termination of the experiment in the UG/University Medical Center Groningen (UMCG).
  2. Equality, meaning that, in accordance with the decree, PhD scholarship students are given the choice to convert their scholarship contract to an appointment (or as of 1 January 2020 an employment contract) as there are no significant differences between both positions.
  3. Compensation for the work done on a scholarship contract by the exact payment differences, including vacation allowance and 13th-month bonus.


Martha Buit, Scholarship PhD at the Faculty of Law, on behalf of the initiators of the manifesto

You can read the complete manifesto here.


03 December 2019 | 22-11-2020, 16:18

De spelregels voor reageren: blijf on topic, geen herhalingen, geen URLs, geen haatspraak en beledigingen. / The rules for commenting: stay on topic, don't repeat yourself, no URLs, no hate speech or insults.


0 Reacties
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments